Credit for Engineering Work Design Competition (adapted from NSPE Case No. 92-1)
Amory, an engineer, is retained by the City to design a bridge as part of an elevated highway system. Amory retains the services of Carroll, a structural engineer, with expertise in horizontal geometry, superstructure design and elevations, to design certain parts of the bridge. Carroll drafts plans for the bridge's three curved welded-plate girder spans, a critical part of the bridge's design.
Months later, Amory enters the bridge design into a national organization's bridge-design competition, and it wins first prize. The entry, however, fails to credit Carroll for his part in the bridge design.
What, if anything, should Carroll do?
--adapted from NSPE Case No. 92-1
NSPE Code of Ethics An earlier version may have been used in this case.
Return to Professional Ethics in Engineering Practice: Discussion Cases Based on NSPE BER Cases
Original Case and BER Judgement
Cite this page:
"Credit for Engineering Work Design Competition (adapted from NSPE Case No. 92-1)"
Online Ethics Center for Engineering
National Academy of Engineering
Accessed: Monday, May 20, 2013