Joseph Ellin's Commentary on "Taking a Position of Influence"
You are a professor planing to apply for a research grant
when you are asked to serve on the committee that will evaluate
grant applications. What can you do? You will have a conflict
of interest if you serve on the panel, so either you must
refuse to serve or not submit your own proposal. If you're the
only one who can serve (in which case your university and its
plan to up-grade its research program, are both in big
trouble), you might consider withdrawing your application.
Otherwise, suggest someone else.
VP Jackson has a plan, but it won't work. You'll serve on
the committee but won't evaluate your own proposal. But there
is still a conflict of interest since the award is competitive.
A person with a proposal might talk and vote against the
competition in order to improve his own chances. Even if not,
it might seem that way to those who lose.
You allow the VP to talk you into serving and you get a
fellowship. The question is whether the losing professors
should demand, and are entitled to, a review of the committee's
decisions. I think they are and they should; the review process
ought to be done again. However opening up the process from
scratch would be unfair to all the other professors who were
awarded grants. So the university is going to have to find a
way out of VP Jackson's mistake without taking away the awards
from the other winners. This may wind up costing some money,
since the fellowships are worth $6000. Lack of ethics can be
Cite this page:
"Joseph Ellin's Commentary on "Taking a Position of Influence""
Online Ethics Center for Engineering
National Academy of Engineering
Accessed: Monday, May 20, 2013