Intellectual Property of Engineers in Private Practice (adapted from NSPE Case No. 83-3)
Wu, an engineer, submitted a project proposal to the City Council. The proposal included technical information and data that the Council had requested. A staff member of the Council made Wu's proposal available to Thornberry, another engineer. Thornberry used Wu's proposal to develop another proposal for a somewhat different project and submitted it to the Council. The amount of Wu's information that Thornberry actually used is disputed between the parties.
Is Thornberry guilty of plagiarism? If not, was this in some other way an unfair use of Wu's information? What was the City Council's responsibility in the handling of Wu's proposal? What further information would you like to have, and what difference would it make to your evaluation?
--adapted from NSPE Case No. 83-3
NSPE Code of Ethics An earlier version may have been used in this case.
Return to Professional Ethics in Engineering Practice: Discussion Cases Based on NSPE BER Cases
Original Case and BER Judgement
Using Technical Proposal of Another Without Consent - Case No. 83-3
An engineer submits a proposal to a county council, a member of which makes this proposal available to another engineer developing a proposal for a different county project. The second engineer uses the first engineer's information and data without the first engineer's consent.
Cite this page:
"Intellectual Property of Engineers in Private Practice (adapted from NSPE Case No. 83-3)"
Online Ethics Center for Engineering
National Academy of Engineering
Accessed: Saturday, May 18, 2013