Fair Credit for Inventors
A scenario that covers ethical issues that arise when more than one person contributes directly to an invention.
Over the next few months you put considerable time and effort into developing the device, occasionally going to the more helpful colleague to discuss your progress. Now you are ready to consider taking out a patent on your nano-widget. The lab's policies are clear about property issues, such as assignment of copyright. What is less clear is who deserves the credit of being listed as an inventor. Since by convention, the order of inventors is not significant in the way that the order of authors on an article often is, there is no easy way to indicate degrees of contribution, requiring a "yes" or "no" decision.
What do you decide and how do you go about making your decision?
Caroline Whitbeck introduced methods and modules for discussing numerous issues in responsible conduct of research at a Sigma Xi Forum in 2000. Partial funding for the development of this material came from an NIH grant.
You can find the entire sequence on the OEC at Scenarios for Ethics Modules in the Responsible Conduct of Research. Some information in these historical modules may be out-of-date; for instance, there may be a new edition of the professional society's code that is referred to in an item. If you have suggestions for updates, please contact the OEC.